3 Comments

Khyle Said,
August 5th, 2008 @2:23 pm  

I don’t really see these two services as analagous long term. Plurk is a chatroom more or less. Twitter, in my mind has more utility for tracking thoughts and ideas.

Personally, I find Twitter much easier to scan for what’s going on. Plurk does not lend itself to this. Plus, the topics I see are either meta (about Plurk, or Plurk vs. Twitter, etc) or personal - like sharing videos or whatnot.

Just my two cents.

August 5th, 2008 @2:59 pm  

Plurk has a number of key advantages over its rivals, most of which centre around making conversations dynamic, linkable objects with a distinct beginning and an end.

These are concepts that our mind prefers over things like Twitter, which are indistinct and lacking in any real context.

When I first saw Plurk in action, I realized straight away that we were in the unique position of actually being able to see memes in action — as real things and not their traces, such as back-links and comments.

Now, combine Plurk with FriendFeed and all of sudden the depth & breadth of your timeline becomes apparent, as the conversations you begin fan out, melding into other social networking services, creating a rich, largely seamless mesh of discussions.

There’s no doubting that Plurk is a game changer. And even if for some reason Plurk was to just vanish — which I very much doubt — the genie is out of the bottle and someone else would just pick up where they left off.

You can’t unthink a good idea…

August 9th, 2008 @2:29 am  

Great article on Plurk! I wouldn’t have met MikeOnTV if it wasn’t for Plurk and many other great social media buffs - it designs aids interactions with strangers and friends much more better than Twitter.

If you need friends on Plurk I’ll be happy to show you around too!
Plurkname: “mr_gadget”

Regards,
Arnold

Related Posts

Leave Your Comments Below

Please Note: Thanks for commenting! If this is your first time, please wait so we can get it approved. After that - have at it.